AMP Admints Policy Breach: ASIC Notches Up Early Win

AMP Admints Policy Breach: ASIC Notches Up Early Win

AMP Admits Policy Breach

ASIC Notches Up Early Win

In light of the infamous royal commission report published in February 2019, the financial industry has been subject to increased scrutiny with the corporate watchdog ASIC tightening its regulatory grip. The corporate regulator’s tougher enforcement guidelines have notched its first victory with the already tarnished AMP admitting to failing to ensure its advisers were acting in the best interest of their customers. AMP admitted to having financial planners ‘churning’ existing customers, which involves re-writing or cancelling their life insurance and take out a new cover. As unethical as churning is, it also exposes the customer to underwriting risks.

Costs to AMP

Financial advisors employed by wealth management giant AMP who failed to act in the best interests of the customer have further damaged the already blemished reputation. Post the royal commission hearing AMP’s market value dropped to $6.6 billion, full-year profit also plummeting 97% as of December 31 to $28 million and the share price is near a record low of $2.25 at 21 May.  To add to this, AMP is now suffering the consequences of “Churning” where advisors cancelled policies with the intention of increasing their commissions. To do this, they would open up new policies unnecessarily for the customer. Committing these contraventions is expected to cost AMP $1 million per offense.

The silver lining of AMP admitting to failing to keep their planners in line and acting in the best interests of their clients results in a simpler punishment process. ASIC deputy chairman Daniel Crennan, QC, stated “AMP has now admitted to all of these contraventions and ASIC will ask the court to make declarations of contravention and order AMP to pay a penalty.” Ultimately this means that the issue will be resolved much sooner relative to the repercussions, Crennan furthering, “If the matter was fought on liability.”  If ASIC had found the violations in the June hearing in 2 weeks before AMP’s admittance, there would have been more litigious actions taken. The severity of the matter is still immense, but AMP has somewhat saved themselves further punishment by admitting to the contraventions.

ASIC’s Contribution

ASIC’s insight on the financial industry has resulted in shocking revelations of the conduct on financial companies. For instance, AMP was charging life insurance premiums to dead clients and blaming administrative errors for these ongoing fees when it was actually conscious decisions. Creenan stated “ASIC’s case argued that AMP, one Australia’s largest financial institutions, failed to ensure its financial planners acted in the best interests of their clients as well as other contraventions of the law.” Having ASIC on AMP’s back with the court hearing in June 2019, it forced them to basically admit that they failed to take the necessary steps to ensure 4 of their  planners acted “efficiently, honestly, and fairly” and within the law between 2013 and 2015.

During the Royal commission, ASIC was criticized for relying more on enforceable undertakings instead of taking the respective cases to court and finding out these contraventions earlier. This came down to “ASIC having limited funds for enforcement” stated by Swinburne University corporate governance expert Helen Bird. Since the last federal budget, ASIC has been given more than $400 million in additional funding, reducing the ‘can’t afford to lose’ mentality, enabling ASIC to be more proactive against the war on unlawful actions.

AMP’s cooperation with ASIC

AMP has been proactive in helping ASIC come to a resolution and to an extent, arbitrate the actions conducted by their employees. It has been noted by AMP spokeswoman that the company, in consideration of the past events have enhanced their monitoring and supervision processes. AMP has incorporated stronger data analytics to help protect clients against further insurance rewriting as well as terminating the 4 now publicly disgraced planners for actively churning some 40 life insurance customers to reap in commissions.

Furthermore, ASIC’s ‘why not litigate’ strategy can been explained the forefront reason why AMP came out with the self-damaging allegations. ASIC’s strategy was brought to fruition with the aim to deter future misconduct and enforce in the community that punishment is inevitable through court action if any wrongdoing is found. Understandably, AMP crumbled under the mounting pressure with ASIC’s growing power and funds available made possible by the further $400 million funding from Government.

ASIC views AMP’s confession to its historical faults as a victory for the ‘why not litigate’’ strategy operating under their fairness imperative. ASIC is hoping that the honest actions shown by AMP today will become a part of the norm within the industry. The clear cut benefits of admitting to misconduct before being caught is the main consideration coming into effect. ASIC’s litigation strategy has evidently lead to stronger cooperation by AMP.

By Nick Psaltis

Click here for a one month free trial to our Lotus Blue Portal.

KOSEC does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation and advisory needs of any particular person, nor does the information provided constitute investment advice. Under no circumstances should investments be based solely on the information provided. KOSEC is intended to provide general information only. Please be aware that investing involves the risk of capital loss. This message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any unauthorised dissemination, distribution or copying is illegal. We do not guarantee the security or completeness of information hereby transmitted and are not liable in either respect or in respect of any delay. Nothing in this message is intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Any market prices or data, unless specifically verified and identified as such, are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy. Kodari Securities Pty Ltd (KOSEC) is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 399 556) of Longhou Capital Markets (AFSL No. 292464) which is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC). KOSEC wishes to disclose that KOSEC and its staff may hold stock they recommend in their own portfolios and that any decision to purchase recommended stock should be done so after the purchaser has made their own inquires as to the suitability to their own requirements. Click here to view our FSG.
Rate this post

div#stuning-header .dfd-stuning-header-bg-container {background-image: url(https://www.kosec.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Dashboard-Blue.png);background-size: cover;background-position: center bottom;background-attachment: initial;background-repeat: no-repeat;}#stuning-header div.page-title-inner {min-height: 335px;}
X